Artículo

“That is OK, he is a good fellow”: introducing the outcomes dichotomy for corporate networks of interlocking directorates

Miguel Ignacio Córdova

Abstract


Firms create a formal mechanism of governance to avoid agency problems: the board of directors. At the same time, unintended informal networks emerge from those efforts that build corporate ties among firms through shared directors called interlocking directorates (IDs). These corporate networks act as moderator of behavior, and of many director’s decisions within this business structure; thus, leading companies to several and distinct actions. This study presents the natural dichotomy of IDs activity from the perspective of business outcomes. A comprehensive and systematic review of 80 manuscripts related to IDs research was carried out, proposing three complementary elements that distinguish the positive and the negative side of these informal networks: i) financial benefits against financial disadvantages, ii) free competition against information asymmetries, and iii) resources acquisition against individual interests. The results of this study suggest that IDs main outcome for firms is a positive one, concentrated on acquiring resources to boost firms’ decision-making processes. Finally, we propose paths for further research.


Keywords


Informal networks; corporate governance; corporate elites; board interlocks

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organization science, 15(3), 259-275.

Bennett, R. J. (2013). Network interlocks: The connected emergence of chambers of commerce and provincial banks in the British Isles, 1767–1823. Business History, 55(8), 1288-1317.

Boyd, B. (1990). Corporate linkages and organizational environment: A test of the resource dependence model. Strategic management journal, 11(6), 419-430.

Bucheli, M., Salvaj, E., & Kim, M. (2018). Better together: How multinationals come together with business groups in times of economic and political transitions. Global Strategy Journal, 9(2), 176-207.

Buchnea, E., Tilba, A., & Wilson, J. (2018). British corporate networks, 1976-2010: Extending the study of finance-industry relationships. Business History, 1-31.

Buch-Hansen, H. (2014). Interlocking directorates and collusion: An empirical analysis. International Sociology, 29(3), 249-267.

Buck, A. (2018). The Corporate Networks and Symbolic Capital of British Business Leaders. Sociological Perspectives, 61(3), 467-486.

Burris, V. (2005). Interlocking directorates and political cohesion among corporate elites. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1), 249-283.

Burt, R. (1980). Cooptive corporate actor networks: A reconsideration of interlocking directorates involving American manufacturing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 557-582.

Cai, Y., Dhaliwal, D. S., Kim, Y., & Pan, C. (2014). Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(3), 1086-1119.

Cai, Y., & Sevilir, M. (2012). Board connections and M&A transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2), 327-349.

Cárdenas, J. (2015). Are Latin America's corporate elites transnationally interconnected? A network analysis of interlocking directorates. Global Networks, 15(4), 424-445.

Cárdenas, J. (2016). Enredando a las elites empresariales en América Latina: análisis de redes de interlocking directorates y propiedad en México, Chile, Perú y Brasil. América Latina Hoy, 73, 15-44.

Carroll, W. (2002). Does disorganized capitalism disorganize corporate networks? The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 27(3), 339-371.

Carroll, W., Graham, N., Lang, M. K., Yunker, Z., & McCartney, K. D. (2018). The Corporate Elite and the Architecture of Climate Change Denial: A Network Analysis of Carbon Capital's Reach into Civil Society. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie, 55(3), 425-450.

Chiu, P. C., Teoh, S. H., & Tian, F. (2013). Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. The Accounting Review, 88(3), 915-944.

Conyon, M. J., & Muldoon, M. R. (2006). The small world of corporate boards. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(9‐10), 1321-1343.

David, T., & Westerhuis, G. (2014). Comparing Corporate Networks in a Long-Term Perspective. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 1-28). New York, NY: Routledge.

Davis, G. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583-613.

Davis, G. F., & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American journal of sociology, 103(1), 1-37.

Davis, G. F., & Mizruchi, M. S. (1999). The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the US system of corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 215-239.

Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982-2001. Strategic organization, 1(3), 301-326.

Dooley, P. C. (1969). The interlocking directorate. The American Economic Review, 59(3), 314-323.

Fich, E. M., & Shivdasani, A. (2007). Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 86(2), 306-336.

Fracassi, C. (2017). Corporate finance policies and social networks. Management Science, 63(8), 2420-2438.

Fracassi, C., & Tate, G. (2012). External networking and internal firm governance. The Journal of finance, 67(1), 153-194.

Fuad, M., & Sinha, A. K. (2017). Entry-timing, business groups and early-mover advantage within industry merger waves in emerging markets: A study of Indian firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 35(4), 919-942.

Geletkanycz, M. A., Boyd, B. K., & Finkelstein, S. (2001). The strategic value of CEO external directorate networks: Implications for CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal, 22(9), 889-898.

Ginalski, S., David, T., & Mach, A. (2014). From national cohesion to transnationalization: the changing role of banks in the swiss company networks, 1910-2010. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 107-124). New York, NY: Routledge.

Ginesti, G., Sannino, G., & Drago, C. (2017). Board connections and management commentary readability: the role of information sharing in Italy. Corporate Governance. The international journal of business in society, 17(1), 30-47.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 91(3), 481-510.

Godigbe, B. G., Chui, C. M., & Liu, C. L. (2018). Directors network centrality and earnings quality. Applied Economics, 50(50), 5381-5400.

Gulati, R., & Westphal, J. D. (1999). Cooperative or controlling? The effects of CEO-board relations and the content of interlocks on the formation of joint ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3), 473-506.

Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. (1998). When do interlocks matter?: Alternate sources of information and interlock influence. Administrative science quarterly, 43(4), 815-844.

Johansen, T. R., & Pettersson, K. (2013). The impact of board interlocks on auditor choice and audit fees. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(3), 287-310.

Khanna, T., & Thomas, C. (2009). Synchronicity and firm interlocks in an emerging market. Journal of Financial Economics, 92(2), 182-204.

Khanna, T., & Rivkin, J. W. (2006). Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries: Evidence from an emerging economy. Organization Science, 17(3), 333-352.

Kogut, B., & Walker, G. (2001). The small world of germany and the durability of national networks. American Sociological Review, 66(3), 317-335.

Kohtamäki, M., Rabetino, R., & Möller, K. (2018). Alliance capabilities: A systematic review and future research directions. Industrial Marketing Management, 68, 188-201.

Larcker, D. F., So, E. C., & Wang, C. C. (2013). Boardroom centrality and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2-3), 225-250.

Lluch, A., Rinaldi, A., Salvaj, E., & Vasta, M. (2019). Directors and syndics in corporate networks: Argentina and Italy compared (1913–1990). Business History, 61(4), 603-628.

Lluch, A., Salvaj, E., & Barbero, M. I. (2014). Corporate Networks and Business Groups in Argentina in the Early 1970s. Australian Economic History Review, 54(2), 183-208.

Mariolis, P., & Jones, M. H. (1982). Centrality in corporate interlock networks: reliability and stability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 571-585.

Martin, G., Gözübüyük, R., & Becerra, M. (2015). Interlocks and firm performance: The role of uncertainty in the directorate interlock‐performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 235-253.

Mazzola, E., Perrone, G., & Kamuriwo, D. S. (2016). The interaction between inter-firm and interlocking directorate networks on firm's new product development outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 672-682.

Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271-298.

Mizruchi, M. S., & Brewster Stearns, L. (1988). A longitudinal study of the formation of interlocking directorates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 194-210.

Mizruchi, M., & Brewster Stearns, L. (1994). A longitudinal study of borrowing by large American corporations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 118-140.

Mizruchi, M. S., & Stearns, L. B. (2006). The conditional nature of embeddedness: a study of borrowing by large US firms, 1973–1994. American Sociological Review, 71(April), 310-333.

Mizruchi, M., & Bunting, D. (1981). Influence in corporate networks: an examination of four measures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(3), 475-489.

Mizruchi, M. S., & Koenig, T. (1991). Size, concentration, and corporate networks: determinants of business collective action. Social Science Quarterly, 72(2), 299-313.

Moore, G., Sobieraj, S., Whitt, J. A., Mayorova, O., & Beaulieu, D. (2002). Elite interlocks in three US sectors: Nonprofit, corporate, and government. Social Science Quarterly, 83(3), 726-744.

Musacchio, A., & Read, I. (2007). Bankers, industrialists, and their cliques: elite networks in Mexico and Brazil during early industrialization. Enterprise & Society, 8(4), 842-880.

Naudet, J., & Dubost, C. L. (2016). The Indian exception: the densification of the network of corporate interlocks and the specificities of the Indian business system (2000–2012). Socio-Economic Review, 15(2), 405-434.

Ortiz‐de‐Mandojana, N., Aragón‐Correa, J. A., Delgado‐Ceballos, J., & Ferrón‐Vílchez, V. (2012). The effect of director interlocks on firms' adoption of proactive environmental strategies. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(2), 164-178.

Palmer, D. (1983). Broken ties: interlocking directorates and intercorporate coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(1), 40-55.

Palmer, D., Friedland, R., & Singh, J. V. (1986). The ties that bind: organizational and class bases of stability in a corporate interlock network. American Sociological Review, 51(6), 781-796.

Pfeffer, J. (1972). Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: the organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 218-228.

Phan, P. H., Lee, S. H., & Lau, S. C. (2003). The performance impact of interlocking directorates: The case of Singapore. Journal of Managerial Issues, 338-352.

Pombo, C., & Gutiérrez, L. H. (2011). Outside directors, board interlocks and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Colombian business groups. Journal of Economics and Business, 63(4), 251-277.

Richardson, R. J. (1987). Directorship interlocks and corporate profitability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 367-386.

Salvaj, E. (2013). Cohesión y homogeneidad. Evolución de la red de directorios de las grandes empresas en Chile, 1969-2005. In Ossandón, J. (Ed.) and Tironi, E. (Ed.), Adaptación: la empresa chilena después de Friedman (1st ed., pp. 55-84). Santiago, Chile: Ediciones Universidad Diego Portales.

Salvaj, E., & Couyoumdjian, J. P. (2016). ‘Interlocked’ business groups and the state in Chile (1970–2010). Business History, 58(1), 129-148.

Salvaj, E. and Ferraro, F. (2005). Las redes de propiedad y de consejos de administración del IBEX 35. In Ricart, J. (Ed.), Álvarez, J. L. (Ed.) & Gifra, J. (Ed.), Los accionistas y el gobierno de la empresa. Análisis de la situación española (1st ed., pp. 179-211). Barcelona, España: Deusto.

Salvaj, E., Ferraro, F., & Tapies, J. (2008). Family firms and the contingent value of board interlocks: the Spanish case. In Tapies, J. (Ed.) & Ward, J. L. (Ed.), Family Values and Value Creation. A Family Business Publication. (1st ed., pp. 236-259). London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan.

Salvaj, E., & Lluch, A. (2014). Longitudinal study of interlocking directorates in Argentina and foreign firms’ integration into local capitalism (1923-2000). In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 257-275). New York, NY: Routledge.

Schnyder, G., & Wilson, J. F. (2014). The structure of networks: the transformation of UK business, 1904-2010. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 48-65). New York, NY: Routledge.

Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., & Rowley, T. J. (2010). When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 846-864.

Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246-264.

Silva, F., Majluf, N., & Paredes, R. D. (2006). Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The case of Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(3), 315-321.

Simmons, C. N. (2011). Converging competitors? Board interlocks in the changing media landscape. Journal of Media Economics, 24(3), 201-213.

Stuart, T. E., & Yim, S. (2010). Board interlocks and the propensity to be targeted in private equity transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 97(1), 174-189.

Szalacha, J. (2011). Interlocking Directorates and Possible Conflict of Interest. Polish Sociological Review, 174(2), 205-216.

Takes, F. W., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2016). Centrality in the global network of corporate control. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(1), 97.

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207-222.

Useem, M. (1980). Corporations and the corporate elite. Annual Review of Sociology, 6(1), 41-77.

Westerhuis, G. (2014). The Dutch corporate network: considering its persistance. In David, T. (Ed.) & Westerhuis, G. (Ed.), The Power of Corporate Networks: A Comparative and Historical Perspective (1st ed., pp. 89-106). New York, NY: Routledge.

Westphal, J. D., Seidel, M. D. L., & Stewart, K. J. (2001). Second-order imitation: Uncovering latent effects of board network ties. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 717-747.

Wilson, J. F., Buchnea, E., & Tilba, A. (2018). The British corporate network, 1904–1976: Revisiting the finance–industry relationship. Business History, 60(6), 779-806.

Windolf, P. (2009). Coordination and control in corporate networks: United States and Germany in comparison, 1896–1938. European Sociological Review, 25(4), 443-457.

Windolf, P., & Beyer, J. (1996). Co-operative Capitalism: Corporate Networks in Germany and Britain. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 205-231.

Zajac, E. J. (1988). Interlocking directorates as an interorganizational strategy: A test of critical assumptions. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 428-438.

Zajac, E., & Westphal, J. (1996). Director reputation, CEO-Board power, and the dynamics of board interlocks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 507-529.

Zona, F., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., & Withers, M. C. (2018). Board interlocks and firm performance: Toward a combined agency–resource dependence perspective. Journal of Management, 44(2), 589-618.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Catalogs and Indexes:

       IndexCopernicus

Plagiarism analysis by: